KEBIJAKAN PIDANA KERJA SOSIAL DI INDONESIA SEBAGAI PIDANA ALTERNATIF DAN SOLUSI PROBLEM LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33478/jlas.v4i1.59Keywords:
Social Work, Sanctions Policy, Alternative PenaltyAbstract
Overcrowding or excess capacity in correctional institutions is a serious problem in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. One alternative that could be a solution is the application of social work punishment. Social work punishment offers a more humane approach and does not burden correctional institutions.
Aim. This study aims to examine the policy of social work sanctions in Indonesia as an alternative sentencing approach and its potential as a solution to address the issues of overcrowding in correctional institutions. It explores the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing social work penalties within Indonesia’s legal framework, specifically in mitigating prison overcrowding and improving rehabilitation outcomes for offenders.
Methods. The research employs a normative juridical approach by analyzing laws, regulations, and relevant literature related to criminal sanctions in Indonesia. In addition, qualitative data is gathered through interviews with legal practitioners, corrections officers, and policymakers to understand the perspectives and readiness of the criminal justice system to implement social work penalties. Comparative analysis with international practices is also included to evaluate the adaptability and potential challenges in Indonesia.
Results. Findings reveal that social work penalties can serve as an effective alternative to custodial sentences for non-violent offenders, reducing the burden on correctional facilities. Implementation challenges include the need for regulatory support, coordination among institutions, and public awareness. Nevertheless, social work sanctions show promise in promoting rehabilitative justice, lowering recidivism, and creating a more balanced criminal justice system in Indonesia.
References
Ardi, N., & Nurahman, D. (t.t.). IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN TIM ASESMEN TERPADU (TAT) DALAM PENANGANAN PELAKU PENYALAHGUNA NARKOTIKA.
Arief, H., & Ambarsari, N. (2018a). Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 173–190.
Arief, H., & Ambarsari, N. (2018b). Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 173–190.
Barda Nawawi, & Arif. (2021). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
Bunga, S. A. P. (2024). KAJIAN VIKTIMOLOGIS TERHADAP PERAN KORBAN (VICTIM PRECIPITATION) TERJADINYA TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN BIASA (Studi Putusan Nomor 402/Pid. B/2023/PN Tjk).
El Thamrin, A. A. H., & Baskoro, N. E. (2024). -Penerapan Sanksi Rehabilitasi Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Golongan I (Putusan Nomor 1016/Pid. Sus/2022/PN. Jkt. Brt): The Application of Rehabilitation Penalty to the Perpetrators of Class I Narcotics Abuse Crime (Verdict Number 1016/Pid. Sus/2022/PN. Jkt. Brt). Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 6(3), 997–1008.
Fatoni, S. (2015). Pembaruan Sistem Pemidanaan, Perpektif Teoritis dan Pragmatis untuk Keadilan. Setara Press.
Hamzah, A. (1999). Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, Dari Retribusi Ke Reformasi. PT. Pradnya Paramita.
Hamzah, J. A. (2024). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Beberapa Negara (Edisi Ketiga). Sinar Grafika.
Hutapea, T., Koto, Z., & Syafruddin, S. (2024). KEBIJAKAN POLRI DALAM UPAYA MENGEFEKTIFKAN PENERAPAN KONSEP HUKUM PIDANA BARU DALAM UU RI NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG KUHP. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 18(1).
Khaidarulloh, K. (2023). Akomodasi Common Law System Dalam KUHP Baru: Konsep Hukuman Kerja Sosial Sebagai Alternatif Pidana. El-Dusturie, 2(2).
Muarif, Z. A. W., & Ahmad, A. A. (2024). DAMPAK OVERCAPACITY TERHADAP PEMENUHAN HAK PELAYANAN KESEHATAN NARAPIDANA DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KELAS I MALANG. NOVUM: JURNAL HUKUM, 305–314.
Mulyadi, L. (2007). Kapita selekta hukum pidana kriminologi & victimologi. Djambatan.
Nugraha, F. A. (2024). Tinjauan Terhadap Sanksi Pidana Kerja Sosial Dalam Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana.
SIMANJUNTAK, E. (2024). ANALISIS HUKUM PENJATUHAN PIDANA DENDA TERHADAP PELAKU PERDAGANGAN ORANG UNTUK TUJUAN PROSTITUSI.
Suhariyanto, D. (2024). Good Governance: Penegakan Hukum Korupsi. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
ZILIWU, K. (2024). Pembinaan Narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Pencegahan Pengulangan Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Kasus di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II A Pancur Batu).
Andi Hamzah. (2018). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Barda Nawawi Arief. (2016). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana.
Dwidja Priyatno. (2013). Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Howard Zehr. (2015). The Little Book of Restorative Justice. New York: Good Books.
Muarif, & Ahmad. (2024). "Problematika Overcrowding Lembaga Pemasyarakatan di Indonesia dan Upaya Penanggulangannya."
Muladi. (2008). Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Bandung: Alumni.
Muladi, & Barda Nawawi Arief. (2010). Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Teguh Prasetyo. (2019). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Law and Administrative Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
